Vendor partnerships are foundational to your MSP’s technology stack, client experience, and profitability. But should you consolidate around one primary vendor to streamline operations, or should you diversify across multiple vendors to stay agile and reduce risk? This guide compares the pros and cons of both vendor strategies, helping you decide which model best aligns with your growth goals, service philosophy, and operational capacity.
Approach 1: Single-vendor Strategy
A single-vendor strategy involves standardizing your core offerings around one major vendor for services like security, backup, endpoint, and cloud. This approach emphasizes deep alignment with one ecosystem, such as Microsoft, Dell, or a security platform like Sophos or Fortinet.
Advantages
- Operational Simplicity: Working with a single vendor reduces tool sprawl and complexity. Onboarding new staff is easier, documentation is consistent, and integrations between tools are seamless. This leads to more efficient service delivery and faster issue resolution.
- Stronger Vendor Relationship: Consolidation often means a higher partner tier, giving you better pricing, access to MDF (market development funds), beta programs, and high-touch support. You become a more valued partner, which can unlock co-marketing, sales resources, and strategic planning assistance.
- Streamlined Training and Certification: Focusing on one vendor means your team can master the full stack without needing to split attention across multiple portals, platforms, or certifications. This improves team confidence and technical expertise, reducing escalations and increasing first-call resolution.
- Bundling and Margins: Many vendors offer bundled pricing across their product suite, which boosts your profit margins. You also gain predictability in licensing costs, renewals, and account management, which improves billing accuracy and client trust.
Challenges
- Vendor Lock-in: Relying on a single vendor makes you vulnerable to pricing changes, service issues, or shifts in product roadmap. If their platform goes down or falls out of favor in the market, you’re tied to their performance.
- Limited Flexibility for Client Needs: Not every client is a perfect fit for one vendor’s stack. Some may need features only available from other providers, or they may already be invested in a competing ecosystem. You risk losing deals or forcing suboptimal fits.
- Perception of Bias: Clients may question whether you’re recommending the best solution or just the one that earns you the most incentive. If your offerings seem too vendor-aligned, you could appear less objective or consultative.
Approach 2: Multivendor Strategy
A multivendor approach uses a mix of best-of-breed solutions from different providers to build your stack. You select vendors based on their individual strengths in areas like RMM, security, cloud backup, email protection, or PSA.
Advantages
- Tailored Client Solutions: This vendor strategy allows you to match specific tools to specific client needs. For example, a manufacturing firm might need rugged devices and robust endpoint protection, while a financial services client requires advanced compliance tools. You can offer each what fits best.
- Risk Mitigation: If one vendor increases prices, has outages, or sunsets a product, your entire business isn’t affected. You can pivot quickly to another provider without a full-stack overhaul, minimizing disruption for your MSP and clients.
- Faster Innovation Adoption: You’re not waiting for a single vendor to release new features across their stack. Instead, you can integrate innovative tools from smaller or niche players that address emerging needs like AI, advanced threat protection, or
compliance automation.
Challenges
- Increased Operational Complexity: Managing different dashboards, licensing terms, support procedures, and integration quirks adds overhead. Your team needs to be trained across multiple systems, and ticket resolution may require cross-vendor coordination.
- Diluted Vendor Relationships: You may never achieve top-tier partner status with any one vendor, limiting your access to deal registration, MDF, or strategic resources. Smaller spend can also mean slower support and fewer incentives.
- Difficult to Standardize and Scale: When every client has a slightly different toolset, documentation becomes harder, SOPs get messy, and scaling your help desk requires more effort. This approach works better for MSPs with mature internal processes and strong internal training.
Key Decision Factors
- Client Base Composition: If your client base is homogenous (e.g., all law firms or SMBs with similar needs), a single-vendor approach is more viable. If you serve diverse industries with varying compliance or feature needs, a multivendor strategy will offer more flexibility.
- Maturity of Internal Operations: Less mature MSPs may benefit from the simplicity of standardizing around one vendor. MSPs with seasoned staff, documented workflows, and strong project management may be better equipped to manage multiple platforms effectively.
- Vendor Stability and Roadmap Alignment: If you go with a single vendor, ensure that it has a long-term roadmap that aligns with your business model and your clients’ future needs. If not, the risk of having to rip and replace later is high.
- Access to Partner Resources: Consider how the vendor strategies affect your access to technical support, co-branded marketing, sales engineers, and partner account managers. One strong vendor relationship can offer more support than spreading thin across five.
- Billing and Procurement Efficiency: Managing multiple vendor invoices, terms, and renewals can tax your back-office team. A single vendor can reduce billing complexity, freeing up time to focus on profitability and client experience.
Staffing and Training Considerations
- Single Vendor: Your team can go deep on one stack, getting certified and becoming highly proficient with fewer tools. Onboarding is faster, and you can specialize more easily. This improves confidence, support quality, and employee retention due to clear role clarity.
- Multivendor: Technicians must be able to troubleshoot and manage several platforms, which require broader training. Your team must be adaptable and tech-savvy, with ongoing education baked into your culture. This model may also necessitate role specialization (e.g., one tech becomes the Datto expert, another handles Microsoft 365 security).
Implementation Tips
- Start with a Core Stack: Even if you’re multivendor, standardize 80% of your stack (e.g., same RMM, PSA, and cloud backup). Only deviate when client needs demand it.
- Use Internal Playbooks: Document every tool and create SOPs for deployment, support, billing, and renewals. Keep a matrix of which clients use what, and who internally is certified on each platform.
- Regularly Review Vendor Performance: Every six to 12 months, audit vendor SLAs, ticket resolution times, pricing changes, and product updates. Whether you use one vendor or five, continuous assessment ensures that your partnerships align with your goals.
- Communicate the Strategy Internally and to Clients: Make sure your team understands why you chose your approach. For clients, highlight how your vendor partnerships benefit them, whether that’s reliability, innovation, security, or value.
Conclusion
There’s no one-size-fits-all answer for vendor strategies. A single-vendor model simplifies operations and deepens partnerships, making it ideal for newer MSPs or those scaling fast. A multivendor model allows for agility and client customization but requires a mature internal infrastructure to manage effectively. The best MSPs know when to lean into standardization and when to be flexible. Whichever strategy you choose, revisit it regularly as your business and client base evolve.
Next Steps
- Want more helpful guidance ? Check out our Strategic Partnerships Answer Center.
- Have a question for our experts? Send it to editors@channelpronetwork.com
ChannelPro has created this resource to help busy MSPs streamline their decision-making process. This resource offers a starting point for evaluating key business choices, saving time and providing clarity. While this resource is designed to guide you through important considerations, we encourage you to seek more references and professional advice to ensure fully informed decisions.
Image: iStock
